Current:Home > StocksArkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure -TrueNorth Finance Path
Arkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure
View
Date:2025-04-15 15:11:33
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state’s rejection of signature petitions for an abortion rights ballot initiative on Thursday, keeping the proposal from going before voters in November.
The ruling dashed the hopes of organizers, who submitted the petitions, of getting the constitutional amendment measure on the ballot in the predominantly Republican state, where many top leaders tout their opposition to abortion.
Election officials said Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the measure, did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired. The group disputed that assertion and argued it should have been given more time to provide any additional documents needed.
“We find that the Secretary correctly refused to count the signatures collected by paid canvassers because the sponsor failed to file the paid canvasser training certification,” the court said in a 4-3 ruling.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would have prohibited laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allowed the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth. It would not have created a constitutional right to abortion.
The ballot proposal lacked support from national abortion rights groups such as Planned Parenthood because it would still have allowed abortion to be banned after 20 weeks, which is earlier than other states where it remains legal.
Had they all been verified, the more than 101,000 signatures, submitted on the state’s July 5 deadline, would have been enough to qualify for the ballot. The threshold was 90,704 signatures from registered voters, and from a minimum of 50 counties.
In a earlier filing with the court, election officials said that 87,675 of the signatures submitted were collected by volunteers with the campaign. Election officials said it could not determine whether 912 of the signatures came from volunteer or paid canvassers.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Supporters of the measure said they followed the law with their documentation, including affidavits identifying each paid gatherer. They have also argued the abortion petitions are being handled differently than other initiative campaigns this year, pointing to similar filings by two other groups.
State records show that the abortion campaign did submit, on June 27, a signed affidavit including a list of paid canvassers and a statement saying the petition rules had been explained to them. Moreover, the July 5 submission included affidavits from each paid worker acknowledging that the group provided them with all the rules and regulations required by law.
The state argued in court that this documentation did not comply because it was not signed by someone with the canvassing company rather than the initiative campaign itself. The state said the statement also needed to be submitted alongside the petitions.
veryGood! (47)
Related
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Here's what could happen in markets if the U.S. defaults. Hint: It won't be pretty
- Housing dilemma in resort towns
- Kyle Richards and Mauricio Umansky Address “Untrue” Divorce Rumors
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- How Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher Keep Pulling Off the Impossible for a Celebrity Couple
- More shows and films are made in Mexico, where costs are low and unions are few
- Inflation stayed high last month, compounding the challenges facing the U.S. economy
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Can Wolves and Beavers Help Save the West From Global Warming?
Ranking
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- The Botanic Matchmakers that Could Save Our Food Supply
- Supreme Court unanimously sides with Twitter in ISIS attack case
- In Portsmouth, a Superfund Site Pollutes a Creek, Threatens a Neighborhood and Defies a Quick Fix
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Durable and enduring, blue jeans turn 150
- European watchdog fines Meta $1.3 billion over privacy violations
- NATO Moves to Tackle Military Greenhouse Gas Emissions Even While Girding Against Russia
Recommendation
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
Olivia Culpo Shares Glimpse Inside Her and Fiancé Christian McCaffrey's Engagement Party
A New GOP Climate Plan Is Long on Fossil Fuels, Short on Specifics
The Day of Two Noons (Classic)
How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
Anthropologie 4th of July Deals: Here’s How To Save 85% On Clothes, Home Decor, and More
In An Unusual Step, a Top Medical Journal Weighs in on Climate Change
How Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher Keep Pulling Off the Impossible for a Celebrity Couple